Politics or Jesus


This teaching was provoked by recently reading “To Change the World” by sociologist James Davison Hunter. 

His persuasive thesis is that in engaging the powers of the political realm American Christians have been ensnared in the world’s ways of doing things. In the wake of the failure of a fairly unified Christian front to stop same-sex marriage (SSM) I believe Australian Christians are increasingly committing the same sort of errors as our American brethren.

Lacking the power of the Lordship of Christ many frustrated believers feel like they must do something to be useful to God in the midst of a dramatic decline of national righteousness.

The power of the political sphere is the obvious avenue to bring change, even if Jesus’ Lordship operates in an exactly opposite way to the coercive power of legislation.

I foresee the Australian Church losing one political battle after another, all the while being distracted away from her chief concern, the abiding life of Christ.


To start with patterns from the U.S., that 80% of white Evangelicals voted for Donald Trump signals the enmeshment between this part of the American Church and the Republican Party.

Less well known is the alignment between Evangelical progressives, mainstream liberal Christianity and the Democrats.

Whilst traditional Evangelicals look for a return to traditional Christian values progressives seek for Christ’s justice to come to the powerless through political means.

A third much smaller bloc, the neo-Anabaptists, considers participation in official political action a form of compromise and idolatry.

The issue of politics and the Church encompasses many issues e.g. the Israel-Palestine debate, Australia’s treatment of asylum seekers, global warming, euthanasia etc.

What disturbs me about “political Christians” is that their zeal for a cause often comes across as more intense than their passion for the Person of Jesus.

Why is this?


We live in a day when everything is being politicised, and in the popular imagination politics stands for power.

A recent example of this is when government registry offices were opened to gay people last week the agencies were all flying the rainbow flag of the LGBT movement. 

So powerful has been the political success of this lobby that its core values have now become part of the identity of Australia as a nation. As with the earlier feminist-libertarian victory over abortion, we are now subject to “institutionalised lawlessness” (Matt 24:12).

But surely this is a reason for believers to become involved in political action?

Possibly, but not as it is commonly practiced for the political understanding of most Christians is deeply confused.

To think that politics shapes culture, rather than the reverse, is back to front.

The DE-Christianising of the West happened because densely networked anti-Christians took possession of the culture-making institutions of society, particularly higher education and the arts.

Despite every good intention the average believer has no access to the more elite “clubs” from which social change is initiated.

Unlike, for example, the wealthy, educated, aristocratic group that William Wilberforce drew together, few believers have influence in institutions that re-invent how people see reality.

If there is no remedy for moral decline through the political process should we take more radical action?

Perhaps exercise the “Benedict Option” (Rod Dreher) and withdraw like the monks of the Dark Ages into creative communities whose enlightened moral and spiritual values will eventually lead our nations out of the abyss of secularism?

There is another way forward for the re-discipling of our nations but it will require unprecedented humility (Matt 28:18-20).

CAN GOD LISTEN? 2 Chron ch: 7 vs.14

Recently, 14 of Australia’s most senior Church leaders publicly appealed to the PM and Opposition leader to make good on their undertakings to uphold religious freedoms.

This political act is as completely unsurprising as it is hypocritical.

How often and how loudly have our spiritual leaders been speaking up, inside and outside the Church, for the cause of our persecuted brothers and sisters in other nations?  

Why should a national Church which has so blatantly sinned against the Lord by failing to pray and advocate for our afflicted brothers and sisters (1 Sam 12:23) expect God to hear appeals for our rights?

Do we secretly believe our long Christian history entitle us to some sort of preferential treatment?

Perhaps in God’s good purposes we need to be oppressed in order to be revived (Hab 3:2)?

Songs sometimes speak of a “near revival”, but is this actually imaginable?

The answer is “Yes”, but not in the mode of power many selfish Christians are seeking.


When Hillsong and Sydney Anglicanism put their resources into the “No” campaign against SSM this signalled that political causes have the power to unite polarised Christian traditions.

But contemporary Pentecostals and Evangelicals have lost touch with the source of real power.

They have drifted far from their roots in great revival movements that transformed the character of Western Christianity.

It is idiocy to imagine that the Lord would send revival through the organised Church whilst it has its own elites and clubs who exercise political power inside the churches in a way that does not look like Christ crucified.

Institutionalised Christianity can never defeat institutionalised evil.

Jesus said to the politically savvy Pilate, “my kingdom is not of this world” and went on to show the true  character of the divine rule by death, resurrection and visiting people with the Spirit of uncontrollable repentance, joy and a radical change of lifestyle (John 18:36; Acts 2:37-47).

The mass of comfortable middle class church leaders and their members do not really want to lose control of their life options.

There is a market in peddling worldview programmes as a remedy to the spiritual decline of the West, but Jesus is not a set of mental images you can learn, cultivate and studiously apply.

The power of the presence of the risen Christ cannot be contained in any wine-skin, within or without Christianity.

When we are broken enough to accept this and renounce any hope we have placed in politics perhaps the Lord will visit us with his mercy (Luke 1:78).



When the ACL recently called on the “standing army” that had formed to oppose gay marriage to prepare for bigger battles ahead they reinforced the feeling amongst many Christians that something must be done to save Australia.

Political engagement however is not the kingdom priority our nation needs if there is to be any remedy for lawlessness in the land.

We need the powerful presence of the Jesus in his compassionate wisdom in all the culture making spheres where “Christianity” has been so soundly defeated (Eph 3:10).

This does include politics, as well as education, the arts and many other dimensions of culture.

A Church compromised by political and other powers will never experience the limitless power of God that can change the world.

We need to return to be seeking the Spirit power which took hold of our lawlessness and defeated at the cross and went on to raise Jesus in perfect righteousness (Rom 8:11; Heb 9:14).

Only by abiding in the life of Christ can there be any transformation of our cultures.

This is happened before, and can happen again, but only if we humbly submit to the final reality about divine power; “If Christ is not Lord of all, he is not Lord at all.” May God turn our hearts to Jesus before any other power.

MESSAGE DELIVERED: 12th December, 2017 |

Author: Dr. John Yates


Related Link: Nil


  1. Hi Admin & John. This is a great article. I love the new format. One question: how do I print it? There seems to be only the option to share. Blessings

    • we have now added print friendly option to all articles see bottom of the article

      Regards Admin Gary Green Churchinperth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *