ETHICS: What is child abuse? The transgender issue is polarising medicine as well as community.

WHAT IS CHILD ABUSE?

The transgender issue is polarising medicine as well as community.

There are two mutually exclusive “affirming” pathways of approach to the young child wishing to transgender i.e. affirming and reassuring of birth sex vs affirming of feeling sex, and only one of them can be right and only one can be labelled as child abuse.

This is a clear ethical divide in which it is essential for medicine, not activists and not governments, to be decisive and authoritative. There is no neutral, no opt-out.

Transgender activists accuse parents of abuse if they fail to affirm the child’s “transgendering”. They also accuse doctors if they fail to affirm.

But, with the knowledge that 70-80% of such children will “desist” spontaneously and that 98% will desist with education and counselling, it seems clear that giving hormone treatment to delay development of secondary sex characteristics thus perpetuating feelings of wrong gender, and further, the amputation of normal sexual organs, is medical and surgical abuse.

And so it is that senior respected paediatricians, with good justification, are confirming that to affirm “feelings”, in direct contradiction to anatomical evidence, is abuse.

Normal opposite sex “behaviour” in children is not to be considered evidence of transgender. To label such children as being transgender or “gender diverse” itself creates confusion and is abuse.

And we certainly should not teach gender exploration in our schools as if it was something to explore, to “find out what gender you really are”. Are we already seeing an artificial “collective” of children wishing to transgender?

Thought disorder in childhood can take many forms e.g. that the birth mother is “not my real mother”, or “I am blind, I cannot see”, or “I am deaf, I cannot hear”, or “I am paralysed, I cannot walk” and then acting out the dysphoria as if an actual disability.

We would not contemplate affirming these dysphorias. Nor should we with gender dysphoria. It is no more possible to deny an erect penis that can also ejaculate than it is to deny the presence of eyes that react to light.

It may be possible to say “I don’t want to be the sex I am” but it is not possible to deny the physical actuality.

To share in and reinforce the deceptive thought and be convinced that it is real is an example of folie à deux – a shared delusional state – or even folie en famille when it might involve others in the family.

Despite the physical, medical and genetic illogic (yes, “nonsense”) of the transgender argument it is gaining momentum in the medical community as illustrated by the inclusion in the Medical Journal of Australia 6 August 2018 Volume 209 No 3 of the Consensus Statement by the Australian and New Zealand Professional association for Transgender Health that states “practices attempting to change a person’s gender identity to be more aligned with their sex assigned at birth… lack efficacy, are considered unethical, and may cause lasting damage…”.

This is another threat to the future of Medicine as we have known it to be. Should doctors not come out in outright condemnation of this as we have with other public health issues? Yes, we can and should be civil to adults who have made the transition, but yes, there is a time to condemn destructive coercion of our children.

And our lawmakers certainly should not be legislating in this madness perpetuating child abuse – folie en parlement.

For our children’s sake!

POST NOTES:

  1. Will you vote to approve child abuse? There is no neutral, no opt-out.
  2. There are now reports from the USA of mastectomies in thirteen-year-old girls.

Original Source: chooselifeaustralia.org.au

ETHICS: STRATEGY: the battle for God’s Creation of male and female, for heteronormativity and against transgender ideology

STRATEGY: the battle for God’s Creation of male and female, for heteronormativity and against transgender ideology

  • Rebellion in federal parliament:
    • throw out the present leader who won’t listen to moderate voices in his own party
    • swing to centre-right and away from destructive leftist policies
    • appoint a new leader of the Liberal Party
    • may he be PM
    • let him be a Christian leader
    • and may he speak truth

Yay! All done. Thank you Lord – even before we asked! PTL


PRAY FOR SCOTT MORRISON:


 To bring all parts of the Liberal Party together; to bring back those of the public who deserted the Libs and went to One Nation; that he will get the Media onside; that he will be able to uphold the truth of God’s Creation; that policies will be sensible in terms of energy and climate change; that he will continue as PM after the next election


INFORM THE CHURCH


INFORM THE PUBLIC


 re how it is currently affecting sport and facilities, education, school toilets and change rooms

 increase the community polarisation – make it ridiculous; make it obvious that the “emperor has no clothes”

 and make it very clear that the two “affirming” pathways of approach to the young child i.e. affirming and reassuring of birth sex vs affirming of feeling sex, are mutually exclusive and only one of them can be child abuse


PUT TRANSGENDERS BACK INTO THE CLASSIFICATION


Of BDD (Body Dysmorphic Disorder) where it most obviously belongs


HIGHLIGHT


the disconnect between LGB non-binary spectrum and T transgender binary and get the LGB fired up

and that “i” has nothing to do with it (for intersex as in LGBTQ0.02% of population)

the disconnect between feminist ideology and transgenders and get the feminists fired up

the disconnect with transgenders being part of anti-discrimination legislation and undermining the legitimate concerns and “rights” of people with disability


SACK AHRC (Australian Human Rights Commission) or limit its scope


SACK AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioners Regulation Authority) and get back to a doctor-controlled MBA (Medical Board Association) concerned with doctor-patient professional conduct without interference from the AHRC which can control civil conduct of doctors anyway


BRING BACK DEBATE!


Whatever happened to the freedom of logical discourse? BRING BACK DEBATE!


LET THERE BE TWO UNIVERSITIES


a University of Factual Science that educates re immutable truth in biological science, physics, chemistry, mathematics (maybe even law where “rights” are discovered rather than created)

a University of Arts where facts are ignored in favour of ideology

Get The Media Onside.

For comprehensive information see Patrick J Byrne’s excellent book Transgender: One Shade of Grey – Legal Implications fro Man & Woman, Schools, Sport, Politics, Democracy.

Original Sourcechooselifeaustralia.org.au

ETHICS: The Battle for Medicine (update 15 September 2018)

“Traditional” medicine is under attack on many inter-related fronts perhaps broadly represented in summary by these specific front lines.

 LIBERTY OF CONSCIENCE IN MEDICINE

The exercise of conscience is foundational to good medicine. It underlies every aspect of good medical practice, to make good patient care our first concern and to practice medicine safely and effectively. 
conscienceinmedicine.net.au:  

Liberty of conscience lies at the very heart of our integrity.  It is conscience that must compel doctors to refuse to participate in treatments they believe to be un-ethical or that they consider not to be in the best interests of patients.

But this is at risk even from within the profession “If people are not prepared to offer legally permitted, efficient, and beneficial care to a patient because it conflicts with their values, they should not be doctors”. Professor Julian Savulescu, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, BMJ 2006;332:294-297 February 4.

For further discussion including doctors not being able to access training places in various disciplines 
See Article “Liberty of Conscience” : 

 INFORMED CONSENT

Truly informed consent is being suppressed by those of particular ideology, particularly with respect to abortion – the mounting evidence for the breast cancer connection, Post-Abortion Syndrome and pre-term birth cannot be so easily dismissed. Our liberty to tell truth is at risk.

 DOCTORS AS “PROVIDERS OF MEDICAL SERVICES”

Turning doctors into mere service providers of medical services on demand instead of doctors with conscience, with the traditional doctor/patient relationship being replaced by a service-provider/consumer contract, providing all that is legal whether or not it is consistent with their ethical base.

To sacrifice conscience and be concerned only with service provision is to destroy the heart and soul of medicine.
See Article Notre Dame Law and Ethics” For fuller discussion: 

 LAW OF THE STATE OVERRIDING MEDICAL ETHICS.

Governments may legislate to permit certain practices or procedures but governments must never force doctors to violate their conscience by compulsory engagement in such practices or procedures – as indeed has happened with Section 8 of the Victorian 2008 legalisation of abortion compelling doctors to refer to another doctor for abortion.

The Independence of the medical profession is critical – belief in practice as enshrined in UDHR and ICCPR and non-derogable, that cannot be overridden even in national emergency (article 4 ICCPR).

When legal code supersedes moral code, the slope of a culture’s decline is steep and swift. J. Scott Ries, MD

Medical codes of conduct must never be subject to degradation by government.
See Article Permission becomes Compulsion“: 

 LIFE – IT’S DEFINITION, WHEN DOES IT BEGIN AND WHEN DOES IT BECOME OF VALUE?

Human life has intrinsic value and worth in all states of dependence and disability from conception to life’s natural end, the need for the definition being highlighted by

Euthanasia: and physician assisted suicide: euphemistically described as MAiD (Medical Aid in Dying); turning healers into killers; confusing the problem of suffering with the life of the person to kill the pain but not the person with it; unrestricted even for the non-dying; even for existential distress in teenagers, economic strangulation of palliative care services; funding limited for patients seeking palliative care but funding given for assisted suicide.
See article Did Granny jump, or was she pushed? Euthanasia is a threshold too far. : by Dr David van Gend of 7 July

Abortion: the continuing push for legalisation with no restriction on time, method or reason (even de-selection of a female twin). Down Syndrome genocide.

Destructive embryo research: for the sake of the living including stem-cell research

Designer babies: to provide cells for siblings

Cloning: for the sake of cell and even organ provision for living siblings or other relatives, even the clone parent

Routine prenatal diagnosis with implied embryo selection or abortion of the “defective” (even compulsory). Already parents who do not agree to have their babies “de-selected” are labelled “genetic outlaws” and face the accusation “how dare you bring this financial impost on the community.”

With the sinister creation of a list of “defects” that are not “worthy” of life.

Including Down Syndrome to the point of genocide of that happy and educable group of people. Watch: I have one more chromosome than you. So what? : | Karen Gaffney | TEDx Portland

Promotion of Infanticide as “post-birth abortion” before the onset of “self-awareness” as being equivalent to abortion and therefore OK.

 MEDICAL BOARD OF AUSTRALIA

And now, astonishingly and unexpectedly, the MBA with its threatened clamping down (Draft Code 2018) of free speech by doctors and with Good Medical Practice being subject to “cultural beliefs” and transgender and identity ideology. These changes would add penalty to perceived breaches relating to any of the above threats to the future of medicine and free debate or expression of views on these threats. Is the MBA itself now into unprofessional conduct in the sense of sabotaging Good Medicine? At least now it has reversed its policy to list complaints against doctors even when the complaints have been found to be without substance. Watch this space.

 TRANSGENDER IDEOLOGY AND CHILD ABUSE

The mutual exclusivity of the two “affirming” pathways of approach to the young child wishing to transgender i.e. affirming and reassuring of birth sex vs affirming of feeling sex, and only one of them can be child abuse as declared.

This is highlighted by – also possibly in contravention of international codes regarding human experimentation – the willingness of doctors to use treatments with known and unknown deleterious long-term effects e.g. the use of hormones or even radical disfiguring surgery to amputate normal breasts or genitalia. (Further highlighted by reports in USA: See article American Doctors Are Performing Mastectomies on Perfectly Healthy 13-Year-Old Girls” 

The transgender argument is gaining momentum in the medical community as illustrated by the inclusion in the Medical Journal of Australia 6 August 2018 Volume 209 No 3 of the Consensus Statement by the Australian and New Zealand Professional association for Transgender Health that states “practices attempting to change a person’s gender identity to be more aligned with their sex assigned at birth… lack efficacy, are considered unethical, and may cause lasting damage…”.

This is a clear ethical divide in which it is essential for medicine, not activists, to be decisive and authoritative.

Good Medicine is the heart and soul of Good Medical Practice. It requires and demands skill, knowledge, sensitivity, respect for people and their backgrounds to ensure good health outcomes. It involves understanding, assessing what is happening and what is needed, education and explanation, and working respectfully with the patient to ensure the best possible good health outcome.

The future of medicine is at stake. When Medicine falls, so does society.

Lachlan Dunjey 15 Sept 2018.

Original Source: chooselifeaustralia.org.au